Mānoa's Accreditation Presentation [Overview]
|
||
|---|---|---|
 | ||
Institutional Proposal |
Capacity & Preparatory Review Narrative
Appendix A: Criteria for Review References |
Narrative Appendix B: Retention & Graduation Data Analysis Appendix C: Response to the Issues Raised in March 2010 WASC Letter Appendix D: Update on the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Budget and Budget Outlook Appendix E: Supplemental Report on Distance and Off-Campus Programs Appendix F: Exhibits for the Educational Effectiveness Review Appendix G: Evidence on WASC Standards Appendix H: Mānoa Stipulated Policies |
|
Manoa’s Accreditation Presentation Overview The 2001 WASC Handbook outlines a three-stage review process which begins with the development of an Institutional Proposal, moves to a Capacity and Preparatory Review, and concludes with an Educational Effectiveness Review. Following an extensive self-review process conducted during the 2005-2006 academic year, Mānoa’s students, staff, faculty and administrators formed a consensus agreement that our campus needed a better sense of community around a set of core values and educational objectives that defined the Mānoa Experience. Our Institutional Proposal, submitted in 2006, offers an interrelated set of thematic initiatives that guides us through our reaccreditation process, including the Capacity and Preparatory Review, the Educational Effectiveness Review, and attendant visits. These are:
The Capacity and Preparatory Review process culminated in a site visit in December 2009, by an external team of reviewers. The reaccreditation process concluded with the submission of the Educational Effectiveness Review self-study and a final site visit in March 2011. |
||
