New evidence from Kauai reveals source of 1586 tsunami that hit Sanriku, Japan

University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Contact:
Dr. Rhett Butler, (808) 956-3151
Geophysicist, HIGP, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology
Dr. David Burney, (808) 651-2479
Professor of Conservation Paleobiology, National Tropical Botanical Garden
Posted: Jun 6, 2017

Makauwahi sinkhole. Credits: R. Butler (L), Gerard Fryer (R), GoogleMaps.
Makauwahi sinkhole. Credits: R. Butler (L), Gerard Fryer (R), GoogleMaps.
Coral fragments analyzed in this study (35 cm in longest dimension). Credit: Butler, et al.
Coral fragments analyzed in this study (35 cm in longest dimension). Credit: Butler, et al.
Location (red dot) of the Makauwahi sinkhole on southeastern coast of Kauai. Credit: Butler, et al.
Location (red dot) of the Makauwahi sinkhole on southeastern coast of Kauai. Credit: Butler, et al.
Tsunami amplitudes for (a) Mw 9.25 earthquake in E Aleutians, (b) Mw 8.05 earthquake in Lima, Peru.
Tsunami amplitudes for (a) Mw 9.25 earthquake in E Aleutians, (b) Mw 8.05 earthquake in Lima, Peru.

A team of researchers, led by Dr. Rhett Butler, geophysicist at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa (UHM), re-examined historical evidence around the Pacific and discovered the origin of the tsunami that hit Sanriku, Japan in 1586—a mega-earthquake from the Aleutian Islands that broadly impacted the north Pacific. Until now, this was considered an orphan tsunami, a historical tsunami without an obvious local earthquake source, likely originating far away.

Butler and scientists from the National Tropical Botanical Garden, UHM School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology and NOAA’s Pacific Tsunami Warning Center analyzed material deposited into Makauwahi Cave, Kauaʻi, during a tsunami—specifically, coral fragments that were previously dated to approximately the sixteenth century using carbon-14. Using specific isotopes of naturally occurring thorium and uranium in the coral fragments, they determined a very precise age of the tsunami event that washed the coral ashore. Prior carbon-14 dates had an uncertainty of ±120 years, whereas the uranium-thorium date is more precise, 1572±21 years. This increased precision allowed better comparison with dated, known tsunamis and earthquakes throughout the Pacific.

“Although we were aware of the 1586 Sanriku tsunami, the age of the Kauaʻi deposit was too uncertain to establish a link,” said Butler. “Also, the 1586 Sanriku event had been ascribed to an earthquake in Lima, Peru. After dating the corals, their more precise date matched with that of the Sanriku tsunami.”

Further, re-analysis of the Peruvian evidence showed that the 1586 Peruvian earthquake was not large enough to create a measurable tsunami hitting Japan. They found additional corroborative evidence around the Pacific that strengthened the case. Earthquakes from Cascadia, the Alaskan Kodiak region and Kamchatka were incompatible with the Sanriku data in several ways. However, a mega-earthquake (magnitude greater than 9.25) in the Aleutians was consistent with evidence from Kauaʻi and the northeast coast of Japan.

“Hawaiʻi is surrounded by the ‘ring of fire’ where mega-earthquakes generate great tsunamis impacting our island shores—the 2011 Tohoku Japan is the most recent example,” said Butler. “Even though there was no seismic instrumentation in the 16th century, we offer a preponderance of evidence for the occurrence of a magnitude 9 earthquake in the Aleutian Islands. Our knowledge of past events helps us to forecast tsunami effects and thereby enable us to assess this risk for Hawaiʻi.”

Forecast models of a great Aleutian event inform the development of new maps of extreme tsunami inundation zones for the State of Hawai‘i. By linking evidence on Kauaʻi to other sites around the Pacific, we can better understand the Aleutian earthquake that generated the tsunami.

Butler and colleagues at UH Mānoa are now working to determine how frequently great earthquakes along the Cascadia margin of the Pacific Northwest might occur. These events have the potential to devastate the coasts of Oregon and Washington, and send a dangerous tsunami to Hawai‘i’s shores.

* * *

The coral dating was funded by Director’s funds from the UHM Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology. Tsunami forecast methods were provided by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center of NOAA. Historical and scientific literature research used the resources of the University of Hawai‘i library.

For more information, visit: https://www.soest.hawaii.edu